Thank you for your concise evaluation, and thank you to Henri for the help.
Keith
Thomas Betz wrote:
> I bet Keith was looking for an answer like the one Henri gave. Your
> comments were worthless.
>
>
> JTK wrote:
>
>> Keith Chant wrote:
>>
>>> Why is it that the Netscape 6/6.1 beta browser renders some pages so
>>> differently than does Navigator 4.xx, IE 4 through 5.5 and Opera 5?
>>>
>>
>> 1. Mozilla is a long way from being a released product and has many,
>> many defects.
>> 2. NN6/6.1 is called "released" by AOL, but is merely Mozilla with the
>> "Mozilla" name filed off and overstamped with "Netscape".
>>
>>
>>> I
>>> am trying to design a site to look good in all browsers but cannot get
>>> it to work in NS6.
>>>
>>
>> There is no reason to do this. All the NN6.x's and Mozilla's combined
>> are less than 1% of the total browser market, and exactly zero percent
>> of the "normal users" browser market.
>>
>>
>>> Is this something they are going to resolve or does
>>> the new browser just not work the same?
>>>
>>
>> The defects that AOL deems necessary to fix will be fixed, to the extent
>> which AOL deems them to need fixing.
>>
>>
>>> For an example of what I am
>>> talking about visit: http://www.hotmetalpro.com/ and look at the
>>> navigational bar on the left compared in different browsers.
>>>
>>> I find it interesting that my page, which is HTML 3.2 compliant will
>>> render identically in Netscape 4.xx, IE 4, IE 5, IE 5.5 and Opera 5
>>> yet
>>> in NS 6/6.1 beta it renders very differently?
>>>
>>> Can anybody explain this?
>>>
>>
>> AOL.
>>
>
