Peter Lairo wrote:

 > Hi,
 >
 > The "new" mail folder pane with red/unread collumns is horrible because:
 >
 > 1. It uses up more space because the two extra collums *must* (unless
 > disabled) take up a *certain* amount of space to be usable. Thus
 > mandatorily taking away valuable space from the actual folder names.

If you don't want the columns, disable it. Why complain when there's a
way out?

 > 2. The only alternative is to completely remove one or both of the extra
 > collumns. But then you don't have that info at all.

Should file a bug to get tooltips back.

 > 3. Newsgroups typically have thousands, if not tens of thousands of
 > messages. This requires the extra collums to be even wider, taking even
 > more space away from the actual folder names.
 >
 > 4. The folder pane looks like crap with so many folder names chopped off.
 >
 > 5. The original solution (to have the unread/tolal messages right after
 > the folder names ("ExampleFolderName (3/14500)") was much cleaner and
 > took up less valiuable space.

If there's a new mesage in a folder, it still shows up as "FolderName 
(X)" where X is the number of new messages. So I guess you're 
complaining about the Total Message count not being displayed. I think 
the number of new messages imore useful and I personally don't have much 
use for the Total Message count. You might have a different opinion.

 > 5. The original solution showed cut of folder names and/or unread/total
 > messages as a tooltip. So no matter how long a name was, you could
 > always get all the info. Most folder names were completely legible, plus
 > 60-80% of the message counts were legible too. Now we have chopped off
 > texts all over the place (message counts here, long folders there).
 > Before *one line* was either legible or not. It's just a mess.

Tooltips should be there I agree. File a bug.

- Pratik

 > Please bring back the original folder display. Please at least make the
 > original display a UI pref option.
 >
 > BTW. I have a resolution of 1280x1024 with large fonts - and even then
 > the space taken up is unjustifiable.
 >
 >



Reply via email to