Peter Lairo wrote:
> H�kan Waara wrote:
>
>> Peter Lairo wrote:
>
>
>>> 5. The original solution (to have the unread/tolal messages right
>>> after the folder names ("ExampleFolderName (3/14500)") was much
>>> cleaner and took up less valiuable space.
>>
>
>
>> It's your choice! If you think it stinks, you don't have to write a
>> newspost about it. You can just turn off the columns - and you will
>> get back the old behaviour.
>
>
>
> Not quite, H�kan. If I turn of the extra collums, I no longer see the
> unread/total mail counts *at all*. In the original behaviour, I could
> *always* see the unread/total mail counts if the folder name wasn't too
> long. The original method was clearly much better, because it made more
> efficient use of the limited space.
>
Yes you do. You don't see total, but you see unread, merged with the
foldername as usual.
--
H�kan Waara ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
