H�kan Waara wrote:
> Peter Lairo wrote:
>> 5. The original solution (to have the unread/tolal messages right
>> after the folder names ("ExampleFolderName (3/14500)") was much
>> cleaner and took up less valiuable space.
> It's your choice! If you think it stinks, you don't have to write a
> newspost about it. You can just turn off the columns - and you will get
> back the old behaviour.
Not quite, H�kan. If I turn of the extra collums, I no longer see the
unread/total mail counts *at all*. In the original behaviour, I could
*always* see the unread/total mail counts if the folder name wasn't too
long. The original method was clearly much better, because it made more
efficient use of the limited space.
--
Regards,
Peter Lairo
