Hall Stevenson wrote:
> * Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010822 19:35]:
>
>>Hall Stevenson wrote:
>>
>>>What's the point of an 'installer' version of mozilla then ?? That
>>>makes it awfully easy for end-users to download and use. I would
>>>think that a re-packager would take care of an installer program for
>>>their branded version of mozilla, wouldn't you ??
>>>
>>>Hall
>>>
>>its because ven though supposedly it targeted to developers, they
>>still want it available for end users like me and others who are
>>willing to test. But, still take their comments, suggestions, bug
>>reports, and RFE worth a grain of salt for the most part. Though some
>>might consider the contribution.
>>
>
> I'd guess that people who are willing to test it can handle the *zip
> package of mozilla. I don't need an installer that adds icons to my
> 'Start' menu, an icon for my desktop, or creates file associations. I
> can do those myself. I would hope people who are a little more advanced
> than the average end user can to.
>
like i said earier, anything we can code and test (with thousands of
nightly and hundreds of thousands of Milestone binary downloads) in
Mozilla makes it that much easier for vendors to release good products
is a win.
--Asa
