Hall Stevenson wrote: >>>Will it be like this forever? Isn't Mozilla at some >>>point going to be a browser for regular users as >>>well? >>> >>Yes to #1, no to #2. Mozilla is intended to be >>packaged by other companies for the user market. >>The builds provided by Mozilla are just for >>testing purposes, and will be even post-1.0. >> > > What's the point of an 'installer' version of mozilla then ?? > That makes it awfully easy for end-users to download and use. > I would think that a re-packager would take care of an > installer program for their branded version of mozilla, > wouldn't you ?? > Actually, anything we can code (and test well) that makes it easier for vendors to do distributions is a win. The lower the barrier to becoming a Mozilla distro the better. You too could package up a distribution and join the fun. --Asa
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Asa Dotzler
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Jonas J�rgensen
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 JTK
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Garth Wallace
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Garth Wallace
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Jonas J�rgensen
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Gervase Markham
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Hall Stevenson
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Asa Dotzler
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 JTK
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Asa Dotzler
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Ian Davey
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Gervase Markham
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 jesus X
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Gervase Markham
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Hall Stevenson
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Asa Dotzler
