Garth Wallace wrote: > > "JTK" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > What I find rather odd is that while many here cry > > "Mozilla isn't for users!", Netscape 6.x, which is no more than Mozilla > > with an AOL sticker on it, is supposed to be the "Mozila for end users". > > Evidently JTK hasn't discovered an interesting > linguistic property known as "context". > > The builds provided by Mozilla are not intended > for end-users. The code produced by the Mozilla > project is not written for immediate consumption > by end users. However, it is written with the > understanding that other groups will package it > for use by end-users. And that packaging in the case of AOL is a sticker that says "Netscape" overtop the one that says "Mozilla". What context did I miss there?
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Asa Dotzler
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Jonas J�rgensen
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 JTK
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Garth Wallace
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Garth Wallace
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Jonas J�rgensen
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Gervase Markham
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Hall Stevenson
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Asa Dotzler
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 JTK
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Asa Dotzler
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Ian Davey
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Gervase Markham
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 jesus X
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Gervase Markham
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Hall Stevenson
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Asa Dotzler
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Garth Wallace
