> Back to the original point, even if Mozilla is not a "distribution", I > still think it could benefit from a spell checker. No-one's arguing that it wouldn't. It's just that no-one with the ability to write one, who thinks it's their current number one priority, has stepped forward. Gerv
- Re: Spell Checker Please Jay Garcia
- Re: Spell Checker Please Gervase Markham
- Re: Spell Checker Please Gervase Markham
- Re: Spell Checker Please Gervase Markham
- Re: Spell Checker Please Howard M. Stark
- Re: Spell Checker Please Brian Clark
- Re: Spell Checker Please Henri Sivonen
- Re: Spell Checker Please Kent Perrier
- Re: Spell Checker Please Gervase Markham
- Re: Spell Checker Please Gervase Markham
- Re: Spell Checker Please Ian Hickson
- Re: Spell Checker Please Perrier,Kent - PLANO
- Re: Spell Checker Please Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.
- Re: Spell Checker Please Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.
- Re: Spell Checker Please Canasta
- Re: Spell Checker Please Ian Pilcher
- Re: Spell Checker Please Kent Perrier
- Re: Spell Checker Please Gervase Markham
- Re: Spell Checker Please Aaron Andersen
- Re: Spell Checker Please Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.
