[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris Hill) wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 26 Nov 2001:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2001 22:50:42 +0000, Ian Thomas > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Robert Zaichkowski wrote: >>> 1. ActiveX support >>> >> >>IIRC this has been considered several times (I think they even got >>a version working in Netscape 4.0) but it has been rejected because >>there is no way to make it secure. > > I don't think this is the reason. Netscape Plugins are not > "secure" either. They are as secure as fort knox compared to Active X -- ICQ: N/A (temporarily) AIM: FlyersR1 9 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ = m
