On 27 Nov 2001 03:41:35 GMT, DeMoN LaG <n@a> wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris Hill) wrote in >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 26 Nov 2001: > >> On Mon, 26 Nov 2001 22:50:42 +0000, Ian Thomas >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>>Robert Zaichkowski wrote: >>>> 1. ActiveX support >>>> >>> >>>IIRC this has been considered several times (I think they even got >>>a version working in Netscape 4.0) but it has been rejected because >>>there is no way to make it secure. >> >> I don't think this is the reason. Netscape Plugins are not >> "secure" either. > >They are as secure as fort knox compared to Active X >
Please explain Chris Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
