Daniel Veditz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 18 Dec 2001:
> Jesse Ruderman wrote: > >> Netscape recently checked in [...] > > > C'mon, you know how things work here. "Netscape" did no such thing, > it was coders running amok because they thought it was neat and > they could. > > Complain to [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you think module owners or super > reviewers aren't doing their job, but don't blame "Netscape" unless > you see some sign of manager approval on these things. I would blame Netscape if the code was checked in by a netscape employee with no r/sr/a, or if the code was checked in by a netscape employee and had r/sr/a all with @netscape.com email addresses. That would scream to me that the change were rushed in by Netscape. The major thing people are bitching about in this thread involving /favicon.ico does not seem to me that it's a netscape rushed in change, merely a "I want this feature" that was approved for checkin. Poor judgement? Maybe. Poor implementation? IMHO, yes. Secret Netscape conspiracy? No -- ICQ: N/A (temporarily) AIM: FlyersR1 9 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ = m
