On 18 Dec 2001 06:05:22 GMT, DeMoN LaG <n@a> wrote: :I would blame Netscape if the code was checked in by a netscape employee :with no r/sr/a, or if the code was checked in by a netscape employee and :had r/sr/a all with @netscape.com email addresses. That would scream to :me that the change were rushed in by Netscape. The major thing people :are bitching about in this thread involving /favicon.ico does not seem :to me that it's a netscape rushed in change, merely a "I want this :feature" that was approved for checkin. Poor judgement? Maybe. Poor :implementation? IMHO, yes. Secret Netscape conspiracy? No
favicon is obnoxious to servers, but it's got such a huge eyecandy value that Netscape marketing would be idiots to pass it up. Unfortunately. -- http://thingy.apana.org.au/~fun/ http://www.rocknerd.org/ "For the purposes of this discussion, we'll assume there exists a spherical gothband of uniform density which represents the Platonic ideal of 'goth'. I won't have their records in the house. Hateful racket." (HiRez)
