Just a word of warning: When downloading nightlies you are using test 
code and as such could encounter a bug that might cause damage to your data.
I keep my nightlies in their own directory and use a test profile and 
only install landmark releases over my day to day mail/browser for use 
on my profile.

JS wrote:

>  I just thought I'd add my 2c, and this is not a flame, the question was 
> eloquently put and I am in the same category - I consider myself an avid 
> enthusiast;I absolutley admire this technology and those that have the 
> where-with-all to put all of this together for the rest of us to use in 
> our everyday work and recreation. One really interesting aspect of all 
> of this is that everyone can have completely different experiences using 
> the exact same software but on different OS's or machines. I, for one, 
> have had a very different experience using the Mozilla builds, I've 
> actually rid my system of of Netscape 4.x and 6.x, 6.x seems to be about 
> 8 steps behind Mozilla on any given day, I now find that I use Mozilla 
> about 99% of the time now; I have a very good browsing experience and 
> the email/newsgroups works perfectly on my machine. This was simply my 
> 2c re: this post and my high compliments to those capable contributors 
> to this project.
>  Perhaps I should insert this in a separate post; there have been a lot 
> of responses to Geoff's post and this may get lost in the shuffle but 
> here goes: I update my builds fairly frequently, just wanted to check if 
> I'm doing this correctly: I go to the www.mozilla.org page and then go 
> to the box 'nightly builds' and then I click on my OS (Win) and download 
> begins. It seems I am downloading a complete new program each time. Does 
> this download actually build on my previous installation or does it 
> completely install a whole new installation of the Mozilla 0.9.7+ build? 
> In other words, am I downloading more than I should each time? As I 
> stated, I am an enthusiast.
> 
> 
> 
> Geoff wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> This post is *not* a complaint.  I have nothing but admiration and
>> gratitude for the developers of moz, galeon, and opera, all of which I
>> use.  I am not a fluent programmer and I do not pretend to understand
>> javascript. I would, however, be really grateful if someone could 
>> explain,
>> in terms I have a chance of understanding, why it is that so many sites
>> (especially commercial sites), can be viewed without problems in my 
>> clunky
>> old Netscape 4.76, but throw up (in particular), javascript errors or
>> otherwise fail to render properly in any of the more recent browsers I
>> have mentioned?  I understand that opera has its own design and problems,
>> but could not the core functionality of Netscape 4 have been carried over
>> into moz?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Geoff
>>
> 
> 


Reply via email to