Blake Ross wrote: >> Somebody paid to have it added. Apparantly somebody with more money >> than sense. > > > > There has hardly been an "outcry" from web developers about this, > despite the distorted picture that a select few like to present.
The select entire constituency of this newsgroup in fact, but who's counting as long as the green keeps rolling in, huh? Nobody who understands this misfeature supports it unless they're paid to do so, and you know it. > And > users, of course, don't care about the backend details, they just love > the feature. Since this feature was, in fact, added at the request of > end users, I'd say the company who paid for it had quite a bit of sense. Then why'd they have to pay to get it added? > Your opinion is meaningless to said company, Yet clearly not to you Mr. Ross. > but it has been the > subject of laughter around the office in the past :-) > > Blake > Knock yourself out, just as long as when I bitch, you jump, and add context menus where they should have been years ago and the like. Now if you can just get that busted cache fixed....
