> The select entire constituency of this newsgroup in fact, but who's > counting as long as the green keeps rolling in, huh? Nobody who > understands this misfeature supports it unless they're paid to do so, > and you know it.
I'm not entirely sure what you mean. Right, I already said users don't understand how the feature truly works behind the scenes. And I already said they don't care. Not sure I see your point. > >> And users, of course, don't care about the backend details, they just >> love the feature. Since this feature was, in fact, added at the >> request of end users, I'd say the company who paid for it had quite a >> bit of sense. > > > > Then why'd they have to pay to get it added? I don't get what you mean by this either. Mozilla users are not end users, if you're implying that the users should have implemented it themselves, or something. Opinions of people on this newsgroup are well and good, but they don't reflect the opinions of people using end user distributions. > > >> Your opinion is meaningless to said company, > > > > Yet clearly not to you Mr. Ross. It is meaningless to me as well, I already said that elsewhere. Reading your posts and responding to them provides diversion in an otherwise hectic world. > Knock yourself out Thanks, we'll continue to! > context menus where they should have been years ago and the like. Heh. Have you been bitching about that context menu? I hadn't noticed; I added it because users wanted it. Blake
