Jonas J�rgensen wrote: > > Ben Goodger wrote: > > > /favicon.ico offers convenience for web masters, and both > > implementations result in convenience for the user. > > > > What site author is going to go to the trouble of even updating all his > > or her templates (there's bound to be more than one, I consider > > mozilla.org a very simple case) simply to add this in? First operation: > > drop in ico file. Second operation: drop in image file & link up at > > least one template, more like 3-4 or several hundred. > > It offers convenience for *some* webmasters. What about those who have > their site on http://some.free.hosting.provider/~my_free_account? > They'll all get their hosting providers favicon because of this. >
Nice. Lord. Note to AOL: MEASURE TWICE, CUT ONCE. > Oh, that's right, I decided earlier in this thread to stop yelling about > this and learn to live with it. Just ignore this message, then. > Exactly what the Man wants you to do, Jonas. Exactly what he wants you to do. > -- > /Jonas
