On 03/11/2002 3:30 PM, Erik Corry wrote:
> Christian Biesinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Jay Garcia wrote:
>>> Also, according to your're explanation, if we list groups from our ISP,
>>> then these very same groups should appear. They don't ... Why not? It's
>>> "usenet" isn't it?
> 
> Probably your ISP doesn't carry the netscape.* groups.  I'm sure
> they would if someone complained about it.  This is the question
> of the netscape.* Usenet name space, and who gets to control it.
> If your ISP accepts netscape.* groups and accepts newgroup commands
> from Netscape then it works like any other part of 'Usenet'.
> 
>> If you are talking about netscape.public.mozilla.* when you say "the 
>> very same groups", I can confirm that my newsserver (news.cis.dfn.de) 
>> does have them.
>> My ISP's newsserver (news.chello.at) does also have them, I just noticed.
> 
> Yup, and your message passed through the following machines on
> the way to me (reverse order):
> 
> news.net.uni-c.dk!howland.erols.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!212.186.200
> .128!not-for-mail
> 
> Note that netscape.com is not there, so I would have got it even
> if netscape.com had been off then net.
> 
> Works with the same technology as the rest of Usenet, even if
> it's not part of Usenet according to some big7-plus-alt
> definition of Usenet.
> 

Yes, thanks for the confirmation. Just as I thought, the secnews server
that hosts netscape.public.*.* does a "usenet" FEED !!!

-- 
Jay Garcia - Netscape Champion
Novell MCNE-5/CNI-Networking Technologies-OSI
UFAQ - http://www.UFAQ.org


Reply via email to