"Peter Van der Beken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Jeffrey Yasskin wrote: > > > XSLT in general; I can't find a tracking bug. > > What do you mean with "XSLT in general"? This is a little broad imo.
Well, it would be nice if we could say XSLT was "fully supported" by 1.0. That may be too broad, but it's just playing catch-up with Microsoft. > > XSLT is essential for displaying XML on the web. > > Well, not really. CSS is more important imho. But hey, XSLT is important > too ;). CSS can be used to style a document that's already ordered correctly. But it can't reorder a document, and it has some trouble with generated content. For example, the W3C's XML-based recommendations can't be displayed using just CSS. I agree that CSS is more important overall, since it's also very useful for styling HTML. Thanks. :) Jeffrey Yasskin
