On Wed, 24 Oct 2001 23:10:02 -0500, Jeffrey Yasskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> We don't need Yet Another half-done implementation which web developers >> will have to work arround. > >Just my opinion, but I'd rather a half-done implementation than none at all. >At least then the user will see something (usually correct) where an SVG >graphic should be. Well, the SVG sepc does have a category for a static viewer, and a way for a page to test availablity of teh dynamic stuff (using the DOM core hasFeature method). So once we implement the static stuff, then we'll see. Regardless, it will not happen for 1.0. > As an analogy, should Netscape 4.x have dropped all CSS >support just because the implementation it did have was buggy? > >Jeffrey Yasskin > Followups set. Bradley
