>When it was announced as an intention it was said that input was being
>gathered. I've raised a number of issues where I believe the language of
>the Exhibit is flawed and where there are issues of derivative lockout
>amongst other things. So far none of those have been addressed
>definitively by mozilla.org.
But when I asked you to identify any law or court decision that
would provide a legal cause of action for someone litigating based on your
"license" theories, you were never able to do that. Pretty much
everything else you have said has been based on these theories, which
you have refused to substantiate by a reference to any law or court
decision.
I do not know the decision making process within Mozilla.org,
but I imagine that they're smart enough to evaluate the factuality
of what is being claimed and informally filter accordingly.
Adam J. Richter __ ______________ 4880 Stevens Creek Blvd, Suite 104
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ / San Jose, California 95129-1034
+1 408 261-6630 | g g d r a s i l United States of America
fax +1 408 261-6631 "Free Software For The Rest Of Us."
