Matthew Thomas wrote:
> Peter Lawler wrote:
>
>> Jennifer Glick wrote:
>>
>>> The mail team has started working on offline mail implementation. If
>>> anyone has any suggestions for improving the UI from the 4.x
>>> implementation, complaints about 4.x implementation, or any other
>>> things you'd like to see regarding offline mail, please post a note
>>> to this newsgroup.
>>
>> ...
>> Does this include the Offline syncronisation dialog? In 4.x, it was
>> pretty poor - very hard to manage with multiple servers, mailboxes &
>> groups. Some form of better selection & maybe profile selection would
>> be nice.
>> ...
>
>
> Funnily enough, that was going to be my one suggestion ...
>
> Something to try would be the sort of interface used in mammoth
> installers (such as the installer for Microsoft Office), where
> components contain a number of sub-components.
----
> This would depend on an XP Toolkit bug to create tri-state checkboxes
> (off, on, and partly-on), since I don't think we have those yet.
Actually, I was thinking of the Solaris installer . But that's the one!
Thanks for taking the time to contemplate the 'enhancement' :-)
P.
