Len wrote:
>
> It'd be nice if the synchronization process was completely
> independent of the "user thread" -- i.e. the user can go and change
> folders, view messages as the synchronization is happening in the
> background. I would guess that's what is planned. The background sync
> thread could prioritise the order that it downloads stuff (e.g.
> headers first, then small messages, then large messages). Is this
> just a rehash of what you're saying? :-)
That would be nice, but I'm not going to have time to do it that way for
the next release. There are too many complications to doing it that way
for me to solve in the short amount of time I have to get this
implemented, unfortunately.
It would, however, be a pretty cool project for an external contributor,
with lots of interesting problems to solve :-)
- David
