Gervase Markham wrote:
> Well, maybe refused is too strong, but it was strongly intimated that
> it would be very difficult to get it in, because it's "not a good use
> of time". And I ran out of enthusiasm after trying for so long
> (seemingly a common complaint among Mozilla contributors.)
>
> Forgive me for being cynical, but every time I come across an
> extremely high quality external contribution receiving the (very slow)
> third degree from a bunch of reviewers, yet I hear another (Netscape)
> super-reviewer say to his work-mate "Oh, yeah, I sr=ed your stuff.
> Check it in and see what happens" in a very offhand way, it depresses me.
Well said. Now, you seem to be in a position to try to change that. I
tried (using much energy too) by complaining when I thought, something
went wrong, and only achived that I am ignored and disliked.
Actually, cases like the rejecttion of PGP made we wonder, if it is time
for a larger coverage of this topic.
