Gervase Markham wrote: > > I think you'd probably find mozilla.org taking a dim view of checking > features into the tree that worked only on one platform. > It occurs to me that it may be more trouble than it's worth to try to create a spell checker that works on both Windows and Unix. Given the availability of ispell, aspell, etc. on Unix and the likely availability of the MS Word spell checker on Windows, it might be easier for two separate teams to create two separate plug-ins. The only code that would have to go into the Mozilla tree would be code to enable spell checker plug-ins, which may already be there. -- ======================================================================== Ian Pilcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] ========================================================================
- Getting Started With Spellchecker Ben Ruppel
- Re: Getting Started With Spellchecker Gervase Markham
- Re: Getting Started With Spellchecker Brian Clark
- Re: Getting Started With Spellchecker Al Rider
- Re: Getting Started With Spellchecker Canasta
- Re: Getting Started With Spellchecker Ben Ruppel
- Re: Getting Started With Spellchecker Ben Bucksch
- Re: Getting Started With Spellchecker David Coppit
- Re: Getting Started With Spellchecker Gervase Markham
- Re: Getting Started With Spellchecker Ian Pilcher
- Re: Getting Started With Spellchecker Gervase Markham
- Re: Getting Started With Spellchecker David Coppit
- Re: Getting Started With Spellchecker Ben Bucksch
- Re: Getting Started With Spellchecker Garth Wallace
- Re: Getting Started With Spellchecker nospam
- Re: Getting Started With Spellchecker David Coppit
- Re: Getting Started With Spellchecker David Coppit
- Re: Getting Started With Spellchecker Peter Lairo
- Re: Getting Started With Spellchecker Asa Dotzler
