Peter Lairo wrote: > [SPAM - sort-of] > If IS0-8859-15 supports more symbols (e.g., �, �, �, �) than IS0-8859-1, > then why doesn't mozilla use IS0-8859-15 as the default setting? > > Why don't all of us use IS0-8859-15 insted of IS0-8859-1? > [/SPAM - sort-of] >
Good question. What advantage does ISO-8859-1 offer over ...-15?
--
Regards,
S�ren Kuklau ('Chucker')
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
