S�ren Kuklau wrote: > Peter Lairo wrote: >> [SPAM - sort-of] >> If IS0-8859-15 supports more symbols (e.g., �, �, �, �) than IS0-8859-1, >> then why doesn't mozilla use IS0-8859-15 as the default setting? >> >> Why don't all of us use IS0-8859-15 insted of IS0-8859-1? >> [/SPAM - sort-of] >> > > Good question. What advantage does ISO-8859-1 offer over ...-15? > >
Well, I've found a problem with -15 in Mozilla. If you look in n.p.m.wishlist in the thread "Blind person needs relief" there is a post from "Grasso" in which the apostrophes in words like "can't", don't" etc. appear as an upper case Z with an umlaut when I have my charset set to -15 but appear as a single quote with -1. The poster, although using a hotmail address, has a .de domain for his website so I guess he's using a German locale, and I have an English locale. Any idea why this is happening? -- Software is like sex, it's better when it's free -Linus Torvalds
