Michael Kaply wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Felix Miata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > >I wish Mike would answer the post I put here yesterday explaining that > > >shutting down Mozilla configured to use only 8 Mb of RAM cache freed up > > >68 Mb of RAM. > > Yeah, your question is what prompted my question. I'd like to know how > > big the Mozilla footprint is SUPPOSED to be. > We don't measure the footprint on OS/2. We just port the code. You might > check the porkjockets or performance newsgroups to see what the working set > is on other platforms. You've never even checked out of curiousity? Footprint when first opened isn't the issue here. What is porkjockets? Speaking of performance, why is 1.0 trunk so much faster than 0.9.9 trunk? If it gets much faster it will be beating 2.02. -- ". . . wisdom is more precious than rubies, and nothing you desire can compare with her." Proverbs 8:11 NIV Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 Felix Miata *** http://mrmazda.members.atlantic.net/
