On legacy systems, it's never going to have performance on par with 4.
Only on newer systems will its' performance be comparable enough to be
indistinguishable. The system requirement for it need to be revised
upward, and dramatically so.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
illion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], fantasai at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote on 01-06-28 05.14:
>
> > Gervase Markham wrote:
> >>
> >> This is a short, unofficial document aimed at starting a discussion to
> >> define more clearly the requirements for Mozilla 1.0.
> >>
> >> [ Note: please do *not* reply to this message with a list of your
> >> favourite "my 1.0-stoppers" bugs. This will only create noise. We are
> >> looking for bug selection criteria, not bug numbers themselves. ]
> >
> > I would like to see 4.x parity wrt selection in Mozilla 1.0.
>
> I think that Mozilla 1.0 should have better performance than 4.x.
> So that it feels like a "good" think to upgrade. I�m not saying it
> must have the same startup times, but at least the menus and ui should
> feel as a normal "windows" program. Right now it feels a little sluggish
> almost as most java apps.
>
