Greg Miller wrote:
>
> That 10% number was an off-the-cuff estimate, and assumes there's
> already a 1.0 or higher release with near-perfect quality. The scheme
> you're suggesting breaks far too easily even with a better number, since
> it would be skewed by good distribution deals with ISPs or OS vendors or
> by a sudden burst of good or bad publicity.
When I mentioned 10% I didn't expect the users do not have to download
or install the software themselves. I was hoping for something like
Mozilla.org community members install it on their friends computers and
let them try it out. Also the 10% was a number that I just picked out,
my point is that if we want to build a user oriented product like a
browser, we should keep user satisfaction as a requirement. If the 10%
number is high for us, we should go for a lesser number for the 1.0
release, but still have a target.
Vineet
--
--------------------------------------------------->
Vineet Sinha ------------>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------->
UW Comp. Eng. Class of 2001 -------->
