Randall Parker wrote: >On Sat, 14 Jul 2001 08:04:06 -0400 esteemed RV did hold forth thusly: > >>if te product is never >>released in an official way, then lots and lots of people will never try >>it, much less adopt it. >> > >A 1.0 release will cause a bunch of people to try it. But if the 1.0 release >has memory usage and performance characteristics similar to that of v0.9.2 >then the vast bulk of those people who try it will not keep using it. So the >about of a major release to attract new users will have been wasted on a >premature release. > My point. That is a criterion that should be met. Release the product based on some specific quality issue: certain bugs should be fixed, MTBF (mean time before failure, etc), but not based on having a percentage of people accepting it before it is released.
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Vineet Sinha
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Scott I. Remick
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Vineet Sinha
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Greg Miller
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Greg Miller
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Vineet Sinha
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion RV
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Vineet Sinha
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Randall Parker
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Randall Parker
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Greg Miller
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Gervase Markham
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Randall Parker
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Gervase Markham
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Mszlazak
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion RV
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion RV
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Randall Parker
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Randall Parker
