RV wrote:
>
> The idea of releasing a product ONLY after reaching point where a
> percentage of people switch from one product to the other is absurd. If
> any company would follow such an unworkable scheme they would never
> release any product. What percentage of people adopted Windows when it
> was released the first time (version 1.0)? 0.01% .. What percentage of
> people adopted version 2.0? .. I don't know anyone, I am sure a very
> small number. How long did it take 3.0 to reach 10%.
If we want Moz 1.0, to be a better product than Netscape 4.x, then I
think we should have a criterion fit for a product past it's fourth
generation. Also, for user acceptance we could possibly try having a
survey which asks the reason for not choosing Moz, with one of the
choices being that they felt the competition product is better. I will
agree that the results will be biased, but my point is that before
making a big release some user feedback is better than none.
Vineet
--
--------------------------------------------------->
Vineet Sinha ------------>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------->
UW Comp. Eng. Class of 2001 -------->
