On Sat, 14 Jul 2001 13:17:43 +0100 esteemed Gervase Markham did hold forth thusly: > Absolutely. And convincing developers of this has nothing to do with the > labels mozilla.org chooses to put on its releases. Therefore mozilla.org > is free to choose criteria for naming a release "Mozilla 1.0" based on its > own engineering goals, and not its distributors goals. Which engineering goals are chosen and accomplished affects which goals can be met to satisfy user desires. For instance, if Moz is too big and slow then the Netscape Communicator based on it will be too big and slow. The whole purpose of engineering goals in a project such as Moz is to allow goals for products developed for end users to be met.
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Greg Miller
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Vineet Sinha
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion RV
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Vineet Sinha
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Randall Parker
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Randall Parker
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Greg Miller
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Gervase Markham
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Randall Parker
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Gervase Markham
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Mszlazak
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion RV
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion RV
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Randall Parker
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Randall Parker
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Greg Miller
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Mszlazak
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion RV
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Mszlazak
