Henri Sivonen wrote:
>>I propose a source only release of 1.0 for the Mozilla end users.
>>(Mozilla provides binary releases, nightly and Milestone [1.0 is a
>>Milestone], for testing and development purposes.)
>>
>
>Doesn't the second sentence contradict the first one?
>
>Releasing Mozilla 1.0 as source only would be *very* rude towards people
>who have spent a lot of time doing testing/QA/documentation/UI
>design/XUL/JavaScript etc. but are unable to compile the whole thing.
>
You are missing the point. Asa is saying that 1.0 IS a milestone and
milestones are also released as binaries. ;-)
