Scott I. Remick wrote: > My observations were that people didn't "switch" as much as the tidal > wave of NEW users chose IE because: > > - Microsoft stuck it in Windows and made them use it for other things > anyway. > - MS gave it away for free (something Netscape eventually had to follow, > resulting in NS loosing a lot of income and therefore financial means to > fund more browser development). Don't forget AOL. Gartner (as I recall) used to track some interesting stats. As I recall, the last set of stats I saw from them indicated that just over 40% of IE users said they used it because MS gave it to them (in Windows) and they didn't see any need to look for an alternative. Another 40% or so (slightly smaller than the previous group) said they chose it because AOL gave it to them and told them to use it. -- http://www.classic-games.com/ http://www.indie-games.com/ Taxation Is Theft
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Randall Parker
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Randall Parker
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Greg Miller
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Mszlazak
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion RV
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Mszlazak
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion RV
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Scott I. Remick
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Randall Parker
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Greg Miller
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion DeMoN_LaG
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Jason Fleshman
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Jason Fleshman
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Asa Dotzler
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Randall Parker
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Asa Dotzler
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Randall Parker
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Henri Sivonen
