> > We probably also need a way of qaulifying quality. > MMMMHHHHH....... gr ! > it's hard at that level. yah. > but one code is rated with an extensive set of human tests. > several people give a mark from 1 (very bad) to 5 (very clear). Yeah. that's the way I've usually seen it done. The people are usually audiophiles, not just computer programmers though :) later mike (thinking about jstereo)
- [MP3 ENCODER] quality time... Michael Cheng
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] quality time... Yann Guidon
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] quality time... Michael Cheng
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] quality time... Jeff Lightfoot
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] quality time... Andrew Stevens
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] quality time... Michael Cheng
