> > For vbr, I don't think we should forbid js for 160k and higher frames. It > would produce some bigger files. > Moreover, it would nearly forbid 160k in vbr: > imagine 128k is not enough. So the encoder switch to 160k. But at 160k, it > would switch to regular stereo. Switching to regular stereo, 160k might > probably not be enough, so we'll use 192k. > Using this, 160 would be only rarely used, and this is perhaps not the best > idea. > Hi Gabriel, You had me convinced, but I checked a few files at random with lame -b 32 -v -V 0 with and without the 160kbs jstereo switch. The difference was sometimes larger, sometimes smaller, but never by more than 1%. So given that the filesizes will be the same, what's your opinion of this feature? -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
- [MP3 ENCODER] ERROR: outer_loop(): huff_bits < 0. Anonymous
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] ERROR: outer_loop(): huff_bits < 0. Anonymous
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] ERROR: outer_loop(): huff_bits < 0... Anonymous
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] FOr MAc ?? Anonymous
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] FOr MAc ?? Anonymous
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] FOr MAc ?? Anonymous
- [MP3 ENCODER] mid/side stereo at 160kbs? Anonymous
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] mid/side stereo at 160kb... Anonymous
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] mid/side stereo at 1... Anonymous
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] mid/side stereo ... Anonymous
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] mid/side stereo ... Anonymous
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] mid/side stereo ... Anonymous
- [MP3 ENCODER] UK patents Anonymous
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] UK patents Anonymous
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] UK patents Anonymous
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] UK patents Anonymous
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] mid/side stereo ... Anonymous
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] ERROR: outer_loop(): huff_bits < 0. Anonymous
