>
> I just got Lame 3.11 and compiled it for my Macintosh.
>
Did you have to do anything special? If so, send me the changes
and I'll add them.
> It all seems to work OK, but now I want to see how the speed can be
> improved. Right now it runs at about 1/2 real time on a PPC8500/180.
>
> I know MP3 can go twice that fast on this machine (Mpecker, Xing etc),
> where should I start looking ?
>
Is the 180 a MHz rating? On my PII 266MHz, lame is a little faster than
real time, so on a 180 MHz machine it could easilly be 1/2 real time.
lame 3.12pre9 should be 20-30% faster.
Mark
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
