> > Good news, anyhow. I might as well post a question while I'm here - will > the fft routine in lame be changed massively any time soon (like, finding a > more efficient algorithm than the current fht)? I was considering writing > an assembler version for the StrongARM, so if there was a planned change > for, say, next week then I'll hold back. > Not that I know of. That fht code is pretty hard to beat. -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
- [MP3 ENCODER] mailinglist Anonymous
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] mailinglist Anonymous
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] mailinglist Anonymous
- [MP3 ENCODER] lame 3.13 Anonymous
- [MP3 ENCODER] lame 3.13 Mark Taylor
- [MP3 ENCODER] 5 dB reduction Gabriel Bouvigne
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] 5 dB reduction Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] 5 dB reduction Robert Hegemann
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] 5 dB reduction Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] mailinglist DeRobertis
