>
> Also, the CPU/estimated and time/estimated numbers are always identical.
> I dont have any non-OS/2 system to try LAME on, is this normal/unusal? What
> should these fields be reading (I assume they shouldn't always be the same)
>
> thanks
> paul
>
one is wall clock time, from the times() system call, and the other is
CPU time of LAME, from the clock() system call. All systems seem to
have clock(), but not everyone has times(). On systems which do not
have times() (HAVETIMES not defined during compilation), LAME just
uses clock() instead and the two values will be identical. Or if
LAME is the only thing running, the wall clock and CPU time should
be pretty close.
That other problem is probably some bug in the % (mod) functions
in timestatus(). Hopefully it will bother someone enough that they
will post a patch :-)
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
