On Sat, 2 Oct 1999 18:43:36 -0600, Mark Taylor wrote:
>
>>
>> Also, the CPU/estimated and time/estimated numbers are always identical.
>> I dont have any non-OS/2 system to try LAME on, is this normal/unusal? What
>> should these fields be reading (I assume they shouldn't always be the same)
>>
>> thanks
>> paul
>>
>
>one is wall clock time, from the times() system call, and the other is
>CPU time of LAME, from the clock() system call. All systems seem to
>have clock(), but not everyone has times(). On systems which do not
>have times() (HAVETIMES not defined during compilation), LAME just
>uses clock() instead and the two values will be identical. Or if
>LAME is the only thing running, the wall clock and CPU time should
>be pretty close.
Hmm, with or without the HAVETIMES defined they both show the time elapsed
since LAME started. OS/2 EMX has times() .. weird.. I will look into it
when I get a chance...
paul
--
Please note:
my email address has changed from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
