Re: [MP3 ENCODER] VBR

[Greg Maxwell]

On Tue, 12 Oct 1999, Mark Taylor wrote:
 
> To follow up on Greg's VBR comments:  
> 
> I agree.  The perceptial model is just a crude guidline, and using
> it with VBR (which will find scalefactors to get the noise just
> up to the limit of the allowed masking) reveals a *lot* of flaws
> in the psy-model.  
[...]

Does anyone on the list know of a psyco noise alg that doesn't have common
orgins with the model used by mp3? It would be nice to have a 'second'
opnion, rather then having to revert to listening tests.. 

I was thinking on just making a frequency weighted simple S/N alg, but I
doubt it would be good enough to do any good.


--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )