>>>>> "R" == Richard A Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
R> On another note My latest Linux Journal has an article about
R> performance of programs based on compilers. pgcc appears to
R> help with speed. Anyone tried to get lame to compile under
R> pgcc?
It's true PGCC(2.91.57) sometimes makes better code than latest
GCC(2.95.1), but PGCC has some serious bugs.
My lame branch can't be compiled by PGCC with the highest optimization
option. The output object makes totally distorted mp3 file.....
GCC 2.95.1 has some bug too, but it is far better than PGCC 2.91.57.
I think it is not good idea to use PGCC instead of GCC, unless you are
compiler developper.
---
Takehiro TOMINAGA // may the source be with you!
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
