Hello Paul,
Monday, October 18, 1999, 8:02:31 AM, you wrote:
>>On another note My latest Linux Journal has an article about
>>performance of programs based on compilers. pgcc appears to help
>>with speed. Anyone tried to get lame to compile under pgcc?
PH> I've been compiling LAME with pgcc the whole time. Seems to work great.
I had major problems especially when using -ffast-math with pgcc 2.95
and 2.95.1 (and if I recall right, before as well).
I switched back to using EGCS (aka gcc 2.95.1) and because i can now
again use all those optimization-switches mentioned in the Makefile I
don�t think PGCC can give me more speed.
Best regards,
Olaf mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
