On 18-Oct-99 Gabriel Bouvigne wrote:
> I think Patrick is right here. We could put a section on the LAME site with
> comments about changes, tuning and optimization done on LAME, including
> stuff tryed but wich didn't worked, or wich were replaced after.
I've done a quick version of what I suggested in a previous email. Check out
http://www.cryogen.com/mikecheng/doc/tree.html OR
http://fox.uq.net.au/~zzmcheng/doc/tree.html
The layout is subject to change, and open to new categories. For example, a
discussion on the ATH model and where it is used wouldn't really fit into any
one routine. (Maybe I'll start a psychoacoustics section)
Of course, this document won't be useful at all until we start writing it :)
Mark already has some good stuff on his page about GPSYCHO etc and i'll
definitely link into that.
If everyone writes a little bit about the functions they worked on, and
different things they tried, then it will make the job easier (many hands make
light work :)
Until/unless someone thinks of a better way of doing it, you can just write up
your docs on your own page, and I'll link to it from this one.
I'm sure there's a more organised way of doing this, but I'd prefer to leave it
decentralised and organic.
BTW: is there a good/quick way of copyrighting/GPLing text documents on the
web?
later
mike
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
