On Thu, 28 Oct 1999, Mark Taylor wrote: > hmm, MP3 is not an open format, so i think it just isn't workable to > mix the GPL and MP3. If you get a license, it is illegal to > distribute since you know it is patented. And if you dont get a > license, you will probably be sued by Thomson if you distribute it. > > So I'm changing my vote: I suggest changeing the license to something > like MPL or BSD. I have to agree somewhat. It would be nice to at least keep the LGPL's benifit of preventing someone from someone from making some nice additions and making it non-free. Also, DO NOT USE BSD! It's got a stupid advertising clause. Use the X11 license insted. Whats the state of including MPL code in GPL stuff? I didn't think you could. -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
- Re : [MP3 ENCODER] spreading function buggy? Lionel Bonnet
- Re: Re : [MP3 ENCODER] spreading function buggy? Mark Taylor
- Re : [MP3 ENCODER] spreading function buggy? Lionel Bonnet
- Re: Re : [MP3 ENCODER] spreading function buggy? Mark Taylor
- Re : [MP3 ENCODER] spreading function buggy? Lionel Bonnet
- [MP3 ENCODER] Lame license, commercial use, part I... Nils Faerber
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Lame license, commercial use... Greg Maxwell
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Lame license, commercial... Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Lame license, comme... Greg Maxwell
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Lame license, c... Jeff Lightfoot
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Lame license, commercial use... Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Lame license, commercial... Greg Maxwell
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Lame license, comme... Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Lame license, c... Greg Maxwell
- Re: Re : [MP3 ENCODER] spreading function buggy? Mark Taylor
