you should seriously worry more about quality than speed
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chuck Zenkus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 28, 1999 1:47 PM
Subject: [MP3 ENCODER] L.A.M.E. and GOGO-no-coda
> GOGO-no-coda ver 2.23 <=VS=> L.A.M.E. 3.34
>
> Hello all,
> We here @ ZLURP! have been playing will all sorts of encoders.
> If you are not familiar with ZLURP! it's a ALL-IN-ONE
ripper/encoder/tagger.
> We are currently still using the L.A.M.E. DLL (Version 3.34) we complied,
> (Were trying to port ZLURP! to the mac right now.)
>
> But anyhow... when we first played with L.A.M.E. Version 3.29,
> We were getting about x1.5 to x2.0 real time encoding (P2-350 /128M).
> Since we moved to version 3.34 we saw a jump in speed yet again.
> We are getting x2.0 to x3.0 (P2-350 /128M).
>
> With GOGO-no-coda ver 2.23 command line I got x4.0 to x5.25 (P2-350
/128M).
>
> Hoping that the .DLL will bring yet more speed.
> At this rate of speed L.A.M.E. is on PAR with Xing's encoder.
>
> Chuck Zenkus
>
> --
> MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
>
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
