yay!
I'm not sure if they will be impressed or not...judging by the posts, they
seem to be more concerned with frequency response than speed. (altho they
do say when something speeds the algorithms up!)
> ----------
> From: Chuck Zenkus[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, November 28, 1999 12:47 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [MP3 ENCODER] L.A.M.E. and GOGO-no-coda
>
> GOGO-no-coda ver 2.23 <=VS=> L.A.M.E. 3.34
>
> Hello all,
> We here @ ZLURP! have been playing will all sorts of encoders.
> If you are not familiar with ZLURP! it's a ALL-IN-ONE
> ripper/encoder/tagger.
> We are currently still using the L.A.M.E. DLL (Version 3.34) we complied,
> (Were trying to port ZLURP! to the mac right now.)
>
> But anyhow... when we first played with L.A.M.E. Version 3.29,
> We were getting about x1.5 to x2.0 real time encoding (P2-350 /128M).
> Since we moved to version 3.34 we saw a jump in speed yet again.
> We are getting x2.0 to x3.0 (P2-350 /128M).
>
> With GOGO-no-coda ver 2.23 command line I got x4.0 to x5.25 (P2-350
> /128M).
>
> Hoping that the .DLL will bring yet more speed.
> At this rate of speed L.A.M.E. is on PAR with Xing's encoder.
>
> Chuck Zenkus
>
> --
> MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
>
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
