> > 6 call best huffman code each iteration > > maybe very very slow, but quality will be up. > This could be called only in the highest quality setting, like in > mp3enc, when quality setting will be implemented But depending on how slow this will actually be, it maybe not always be desired, so I'm not sure if this should make the difference between a --quality 8 or --quality 9 (9 being the maximum) option, if you know what I mean. > > Any ideas ? or does someone doing part of them ? > I'm planning to write an extension to the --preset option: loading > presets from a file. > Does anyone think that it's usefull or useless? I think this would be a very useful feature. Ivo -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
- [MP3 ENCODER] the road to next(v4.00?) Takehiro Tominaga
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] the road to next(v4.00?) Gabriel Bouvigne
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] the road to next(v4.00?) Segher Boessenkool
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] the road to next(v4.00?) Scott Manley
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] the road to next(v4.... Takehiro Tominaga
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] the road to next(v4.00?) Ivo van Heel
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] the road to next(v4.00?) Zia Mazhar
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] the road to next(v4.... David Balazic
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] the road to nex... Ivo van Heel
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] the road to next(v4.00?) Ross Levis
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] the road to next(v4.00?) Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] the road to next(v4.00?) Gabriel Bouvigne
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] the road to next(v4.00?) Segher Boessenkool
- [MP3 ENCODER] CVS Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] CVS Jan Peman
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] CVS Scott Manley
