> > 6 call best huffman code each iteration
> >         maybe very very slow, but quality will be up.
> This could be called only in the highest quality setting, like in
> mp3enc, when quality setting will be implemented

But depending on how slow this will actually be, it maybe not always be
desired, so I'm not sure if this should make the difference between a
--quality 8 or --quality 9 (9 being the maximum) option, if you know what
I mean.

> > Any ideas ? or does someone doing part of them ?
> I'm planning to write an extension to the --preset option: loading
> presets from a file.
> Does anyone think that it's usefull or useless?

I think this would be a very useful feature.

Ivo

--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )

Reply via email to