> I'm asking myself why the source of Lame 3.70 is still a patch against > the ISO-Code. In the history there is a remark that the last ISO-Code is > removed from LAME - So it would be much more simple to distribute a plain > sourcecode instead a patch, or am I wrong ?! Because at that point, LAME becomes a full MPEG encoder and could not be distributed without paying licensing fees to Fraunhofer et al. Monty -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Speeding up window_subban... Naoki Shibata
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Speeding up window_su... Takehiro Tominaga
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] the road to next(v4.00?) Bruce Janson
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] the road to next(v4.00?) Ross Levis
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] the road to next(v4.00?) Jaroslav Lukesh
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] the road to next(v4.00?) Shawn Riley
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] the road to next(v4.00?) Richard A. Smith
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] the road to next(v4.00?) Adam Whitehead
- [MP3 ENCODER] The SUBJECT... Zia Mazhar
- [MP3 ENCODER] Why it's still a patch against is... Christian Schepke
