>>>>> "Z" == Zia Mazhar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Z> It means that LAME is not producing a faulty or a damaged file,
Z> rather it is producing a file that is a little incompatible
Z> with many players.
I think it is too. I'm disappointed with about current MP3 decoders scene.
Almost all people are interested in the cool display (or skin support),
or the Internet support. Seems no improvement about sound quality.
Z> A good quality decoder can handle the file perfectly. There's
Z> some scope of debate here, though. But as long as LAME Encoder
Z> is complying to the MP3 standards, then I guess it's okay...
>>>>> "G" == Greg Maxwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
G> Other encoders probably are tuned to avoid triggering the bug
G> (i.e. but not using the flakey feature).
I made a "--noscfsi" option for some buggy decoder, but Mark deleted :)
maybe his policy of LAME is challenging to the ISO limitation and
he think we can neglect such buggy decoder.
---
Takehiro TOMINAGA // May the source be with you !
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
